Los Techies - Latest Comments

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Fanout Exchanges

derekgreer — Tue, 14 May 2013 09:08:40 -0000

Thanks, Patty. This has been updated.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Fanout Exchanges

Patty — Tue, 14 May 2013 00:54:46 -0000

This is really helpful! You do have one typo above that you might want to correct:

ExchangeDeclare("direct-exchange-example", ExchangeType.Fanout,...

should be:

ExchangeDeclare("fanout-exchange-example", ExchangeType.Fanout,

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

derekgreer — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:09:24 -0000

Yep.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

derekgreer — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:07:39 -0000

Thanks, Joel. Hope all is well in The Great State.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

Joel — Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:18:38 -0000

Hey Derek, ran across this researching .net amqp options. Nice to see that you're using rabbit. It seems like the cannonical amqp impl. You rock bud..

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

david — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:31:15 -0000

thanks for your article it helps me a lot to enable the management plugin. I was using first RabbitMQ service (re) install on the start->all programs but only the sequence of commands you mentionned lastly enable the plugin.

Re: JavaScript Closures Explained

Frederick Ancheta — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:14:22 -0000

the diagrams in your technical explanations are very helpful! great work

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Topic Exchanges

derekgreer — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:32:31 -0000

That's a cut-n-paste error. All references to the exchange in this example should read "topic-exchange-example". I didn't notice the error because, while the producer declares the incorrect exchange name, it does publish to the correct exchange name which the client also declares.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Topic Exchanges

Kevin Reilly — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:38:39 -0000

Hi Derek - Greate series on RabbitMQ. One question regarding the Topic Exchange code. Can you describe why two different exchanges need be used when creating the Producer?

Re: Effective Tests: How Faking It Can Help You

AudreyBrooks — Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:43:08 -0000

Been looking for this article for long time ago and finally found here. thanks for sharing this post. appreciate.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Headers Exchanges

derekgreer — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:27:20 -0000

The Java API is pretty similar to the .Net API, so you should be able to mostly use the example here as a guide.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Headers Exchanges

dipesh — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:11:07 -0000

can someone post an example of header exchange using java?

Re: JavaScript Closures Explained

William Kiptoon — Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:12:34 -0000

OK.....

But what are closures useful for?

Don't get me wrong, I'm certain they can be used for SOMETHING. Heck, if I felt like it, I could re-write all the javascript on my website in the form of closures?

But why would I want to do that?

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Headers Exchanges

alexis richardson — Wed, 30 May 2012 03:57:10 -0000

Thank-you for posting this series, Derek :-)

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

derekgreer — Mon, 21 May 2012 09:11:53 -0000

Yes, I should have included that in the article. Thanks.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

Dmytro Kudryavtsev — Mon, 21 May 2012 01:15:50 -0000

To use the web UI you will need to authenticate as a RabbitMQ user (on a fresh installation the user "guest" is created with password "guest").
http://www.rabbitmq.com/manage...

Re: Dependency Management in .Net

Mo Cassidy — Fri, 18 May 2012 15:25:21 -0000

I don't post a lot of comments on blog articles, but I really like how this was written with the history of the industry as well as your own experiences.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Fanout Exchanges

Mike Hadlow — Wed, 16 May 2012 10:18:23 -0000

Great series Derek. Can I make a shameless plug for my simplified and opinionated RabbitMQ API for .NET, EasyNetQ ;)

https://github.com/mikehadlow/...

Re: JavaScript Closures Explained

Alan K Fadliawan — Sat, 12 May 2012 11:01:52 -0000

Good job. The diagrams are easily understood and I like how you use the term 'pairing'. Thanks!

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

Bryan Nehl — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:47:23 -0000

Thanks for this post. I was trying to get the management console working with no luck and came across this post. They key thing I was missing was to run from an elevated command prompt. Did that and got the server working! Without that, everything looked like it was working and installed but the web server wasn't up. Thanks. :)

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

Fernando Zamora Jimenez — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:13:54 -0000

In other words the receiver may be down but it can pickup the messages once it comes backup since they are in a queue. I'm not sure if the "asynchronous workflow" covers this already.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

Fernando Zamora Jimenez — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:12:20 -0000

hmmm... I always thought one of the big reasons for message queueing service was because both systems sender and receiver are not necessarily connected at the same time. This would allow the receiver and sender to send and receive on independent schedules from one another.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

Fernando Zamora Jimenez — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:09:18 -0000

Thanks for sharing. Can't wait for your next post. You kinda left me hanging! Just Kidding. Thanks again for sharing.

Re: RabbitMQ for Windows: Introduction

derekgreer — Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:05:31 -0000

Hey, Joe. Most situations where you have a point-to-point connection (e.g. client/server, RPC, Web Services, etc.) can be facilitated by messaging and often with more ease, so you might consider it for that reason alone.

Some situations where you should consider using messaging are:

- When you have a heterogeneous development environment
- When you have asynchronous workflow needs
- When you need to monitor communication
- When you have high reliability needs
- When you need scalability
- When you hate XML

Re: Dependency Management in .Net: Offline Dependencies with NuGet Command Line Tool

NA — Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:31:19 -0000

Interesting read. Thanks for posting!